Furthermore, the Framework’s monitoring requirements are also discussed in detail in the General Plan Framework Element’s Final Environmental Report, where it is clearly described as a detailed, mandatory, and on-going aspect of the General Plan Framework Element, not a discretionary feature contingent on available staffing. In fact, after the City Council adopted the General Plan Framework Element in 1996, I was assigned to a Framework monitoring unit that produced three annual monitoring reports in the late 1990s. As a City Planning staff person who participated in the preparation of the General Plan Framework Element, there was never any discussion or written documentation presenting the Framework’s monitoring program and the annual monitoring report as discretionary. But it is incorrect that these monitoring provisions were originally intended to be discretionary. All references to General Plan monitoring – which the Department of City Planning has overlooked since 1999 – could be excised from the citywide General Plan Framework Element. It is possible to amend the General Plan, and the procedures are explained in detail in Charter section 555. Initiate the process of amending the General Plan’s Framework Element to make clear that the Framework Element does not require, and was never intended to require, Community Plans themselves to contain monitoring policies or programs, and that the Framework Element’s monitoring programs are discretionary, not mandatory, and that they are contingent on the availability of resources and competing priorities, as the Court of Appeal held in Saunders v. INSTRUCT the Planning Department, in consultation with the City Attorney, to:Ī. On Tuesday Februthe LA City Council passed Council motion 12-0303-S3. ![]() Judge Goodman’s Ruling Posted in Hollywood Development, Uncategorized | Tagged City Council, development, Hollywood Community Plan, Infrastructure, litigation, urban development | Leave a reply City Votes to Remove Monitoring Policies from Community Plans However, one of my favorite quotes was, …see complete article here. Further he stated that the City’s actions constitute a misstatement and misapplication of the City Charter, state law and his February 11, 2014 Judgment. He stated that the Resolution the City adopted was demonstrably arbitrary, capricious and without basis in law, that no reasonable person could conclude that adoption of the April 2 ndResolution made the General Plan of the City of Los Angeles internally consistent but that the contrary was the case. The judge was probably being very kind when he said that move was “too clever by half”.īut Judge Goodman did not stop there. The City Council even went so far in the Resolution they adopted to deal with the stern admonition from the Court to state that the intent of their action was to “overrule and supersede” the writ and judgment of the Court. However, in the guise of complying with the Judge’s order, the City voted on April 2 nd, 2014 to modify the General Plan Framework to make community plan monitoring and reporting discretionary. The City did rescind the new plan and reenact the old plan. In February of this year the City was soundly defeated by the above coalition of community groups when Judge Goodman ordered the City to rescind its new Hollywood Community Plan. ![]() ![]() More specifically, FTC and its fellow community groups were there to challenge what the City did in response to being ordered by the Court to scrap the flawed plan. THE CITY-On June 20, Fix The City, Save Hollywood, La Mirada, HELP and Attorneys for the City of Los Angeles once again stepped into Judge Allan Goodman’s Superior Court to deal with the now-defunct Hollywood Community Plan update. writes formal comments 11-2020 Posted in Public Virtual Hearing, Save Hollywood, The Big Picture, Urban Development | Tagged density, development, Hollywood Community Plan, Infrastructure, Planning, traffic, urban development | Leave a reply New Millennium Scoping Meeting Sept 12, 6 – 8 p.m. ![]() In lieu of attending the Public Hearing, comments may be submitted by email or hardcopy through 5:00 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. – Open House (Virtual)ĥ p.m. The Open House and Public Hearing is open to everyone who would like to participate.Ĥ p.m. The Plan update would encourage more housing and jobs, preserve historic resources, improve pedestrian-friendly design, and address climate change through the year 2040 by making policy and land use/zoning changes.Ī public hearing is a means to collect comments from stakeholders before the Plan update is brought to the City Planning Commission, and ultimately the City Council for adoption. The virtual Open House and Public Hearing for the Hollywood Community Plan Update is scheduled for December 9, 2020.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |